IRS - Fraud of gargantuan proportions
See updated page on further cases against the IRS at Foundation for Truth in Law. To date, all courts, including three times to the U.S. Supreme Court denied due process and obstructed due process of law and the exposing of this wage tax fraud against Americans.
Below are cases past, but relevant to the tax fraud.
New and vital Knox document discovered proving most Americans are NOT lawfully required to file income forms or pay income taxes
My court filed document against the IRS, based on the Knox document above, with added material.
The truth about the IRS fraud against all Americans is coming out more and more. The rabbit hole is huge, and, of course, could not all be part of the below case. After 10 courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, all 10 courts ignored the evidence against the IRS and would not hear or consider it.
The case stems from the following;
PLEASE NOTE: It is critical to educate yourself in the facts of this topic so you understand the elements and how the fraud is working. You need to be able to stand on your beliefs and knowledge, so do your homework. Feel free to ask questions via Email if you have any. We are in this together!!
History: All Americans are expected to know the law, and follow it, which, sad to say, I was completely ignorant of at the time, in most every aspect. I was challenged on some of the IRS practices back in 2002, and began investigating the IR Code, Constitution and laws of the land to see what the law actually said, and was shocked to discover the truth. I began asking the IRS questions about its laws and procedures in 2003, and to date, have only received the traditional propaganda as a response, with no actual evidence of its actions as being lawful.
With the many excellent sources for researching this topic, or any law or Constitutional topic, I began building my case... adding to questions and challenges to what was appearing more and more to be a huge fraud and scam against all Americans. After dozens of books, research websites, case law studies, etc., I had a good argument, but the IRS completely ignored the relevant questions and evidence, and played their paper bullet game.
After not being able to obtain my personal records, the IRS, in 2008, filed summons with 7 businesses I do work with, demanding my records they had. I filed 7 Motions to Quash in 7 different state federal district courts, but the courts completely ignored all elements of the case, and sided with the IRS.
About a year or so later, I received "Notice of Deficiencies" on years 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, totaling $140,000 in alleged taxes owed. I took the case to the Tax Court in Denver, with a huge amount of evidence against IRS standing to be doing what they were doing. The tax court completely ignored all evidence, and looked at form only, and denied my case. In the mean time, the IRS sent me another deficiency notice for the same years for over 280,000, while the case was still in the court. (Shows how confused and desperate they are getting).
The case then was presented to the Appeals Court, 10th District, which essentially followed suit with the tax court and completely ignored the substance, evidence, and standing challenge, and ruled against me.
This opened the door for the U.S. Supreme Court, where, after 2 months of preparation, I filed suit September 6, 2012, and was noticed via letter received September 15th that the Court placed the case on the docket.
After 14 court cases and 10+ years of direct confrontation, it now appears this issue may actually have its day in court, and hopefully bring justice and truth into the light. Please read the material and pass it on as far and wide as possible (media, etc) so we get exposure on this and put public pressure on the Courts to do the right thing.
History of Case as of 9-25-17
This case is evidence that could eliminate the IRS if it were simply made known… WND.com article on IRS and this case, by Jack Minor
Jack Minor of WND.com did the Joyce Riley Power Hour radio interview on 6-4-13 on my IRS case. (Fast forward a bit to get to the next interview).
I have completed the Petition for Rehearing and it will be sent on 4-11-13. Regardless of what the Court now chooses to do, it will be a victory for all of us in that whatever they do, it is a response to us. The IRS MUST respond to this Petition according to the court rules, unlike their default earlier. Pass this on far and wide.
The Supreme Court denied the rehearing... http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-6169.htm, and have essentially declared what was stated in the rehearing petition. Due process is dead for all Americans in regard to the IRS government fraud. The clear solution now is State nullification and creating your local area as a Liberty Zone to stop federal encroachment outside of their jurisdiction and against the Constitution and Rule of Law.
Completed Professional Petition sent to the Court: Please note - Page numbers next to questions and case cites are linked in this document so you can click back and forth from question, to case cite, and back.
NOTICE! The documents in our TAX FRAUD DOCUMENT ARCHIVES are available to you for research. I hope I can enter these into the Supreme Court record as evidence in some way in this case. They help to conclusively prove the fraud and deceit the IRS has been using for nearly 100 years.
Received notice from the court that they denied my Motion for Reconsideration of having to file the docket fee, as well as having to professionally redo the entire petition to attorney standards (even against the court's own previous rulings on substance being more important than form).
This means I now have till February 18th, 2013 to come up with the $300 docket fee, as well as approximately $1500-2000 for professionally printing at least 48 copies of the Petition (40 plus original for the court and 3 for IRS). Anyone who can help with this can make donations can go to our Funding Page.
Complete Supreme Court case document of all below S.Ct. docs filed in the case to date
I filed a document titled US Supreme Court Motion for ORDER on Settled Facts of Law. This is regarding the default by IRS/DOJ to answer the case and argument as stated below.
After filing with the court, Respondent (DOJ for IRS) was to reply to my petition. As stated below, they replied with a "Waiver of right to respond." Of course, this means far more than I at first thought.
The Supreme Court went on to denied my in forma pauperis (I have no money) application, and required me to file a completely new petition complying with their attorney standards of booklet form etc., costing not only the $300 docket fee for a new petition, but about $1500-2000 for the printing and shipping, and all this to be done by November 19, 2012. Of course this is stalling and unconscionable actions they did NOT have to take. They ignored pro se filing case law and precedent to accept substance above form. They said nothing about the waiver default by the Respondent.
I filed three separate documents with the court on 11-6-12... Motion for reconsideration, Application for more time, and a Rule 55 NOTICE to clerk. The latter could be a game changer, as it states under Federal Rules of civil procedure:
Rule 55. Default; Default Judgment
(a) ENTERING A DEFAULT. When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default.
In denying to respond and defend against my suit, the IRS, defaulted. However, as the Rule 55 above mentions, and as other sources have elaborated on, their refusal to answer IS an answer. That answer is, "we do not deny anything you are saying," and thereby they agree to it all. This means the court is deprived of subject matter jurisdiction because the parties have agreed and settled the controversy, and "should," by law, give judgment against them on all counts, and allow me remedy. Their acceptance of my petition and docket of it under case # 12-6169, was an acceptance... a contract with them to perform their lawful duty, so in effect, the case WAS accepted to be heard.
It is likely I didn't have to file the last documents, but it is better to do more than less. I will now prepare another documents titled "Motion for ORDER to Intervenor the United States Government Solicitor General, Counsel of Record, Donald B. Verrilli, Jr.," and file it Wednesday.
Supreme Court has docketed my IRS tax case! I received the following LETTER telling me my case was placed on the docket, and it seems the justices will consider hearing the case. 99% of all cases to the S.Ct. are NOT accepted. You can access the actual docket at http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-6169.htm, or Click here.
I received a response letter from the DOJ/Solicitor General, Donald Verrilli, Jr., stating "The government hereby waives its right to file a response to the petition in this case, unless requested to do so by the Court." See letter here (Spelled my name wrong...???)
If you want to research this topic in far greater detail, there are a number of websites with the research, case law, and sources for this information. Please make use of it and pass it on... we need to educate ourselves out of this slavery, and defend our republic and laws.
Family Guardian extensive website for research!
Income Tax-documents for challenging!
Supreme Court has docketed my IRS tax case to be reviewed! I received the following LETTER telling me my case was placed on the docket. 99% of all cases to the S.Ct. are NOT accepted. You can access the actual docket at http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/12-6169.htm, or Click here. Use this stuff, and pray for a victory for all of us!
June 8, 2012; Appeals Court completely denied all evidence and case material. I now have to file with the Supreme Court.
Appeals Court - Reply to IRS Brief. Final brief before Appeals court begins deliberation.
IRS response to original Brief-how lame....
Appeals Court Brief filed 3-15-12. Waiting for IRS response due by April 17, 2012
The following cases were filed in response to the Tax Court's violation of multiple laws, and providing improper service of process:
Affidavit of Prejudice to Recuse Tax Court Judge Carluzzo: Second recusal... first was followed, but this one ignored.
The below three documents were filed in response to the U.S. Tax Court (ustaxcourt.gov) denial of my original petition, case number 10758-11:
The church has a good supply of legal and constitutional support for avoiding government encroachment... USE IT!!!
DO YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR OWN QUESTIONS AND BEGIN YOUR PAPER TRAIL OF LAWFUL IRS CHALLENGE?
Below are some sample letters and correspondence you can use to begin challenging the fraud in your own case. This simply shows the IRS that you know the fraud, and you are asking for their rebuttal to the challenges. Their own website and code states that they will answer questions, but they don't answer these. In not answering, they are in default, and you win and can stand on your evidence and beliefs.
Be sure to read the Supreme Court Petition and the What is "Income?" document proving your wages are NOT "income," so you can see some of the fraud and arguments. Also be sure to obtain the book "Constitutional Income: Do you have any?" by Phil Hart at his Constitutional Income Website. Much more can be researched at The Matrix Has You Website!
FOIA Request to IRS on definition of Income: Send something similar to your IRS office, certified mail, return receipt requested, to show good faith in requesting clarification on the "income" definition laws, and include a copy of "What is Income?" with your request as evidence to rebut.
FOIA Request to IRS with basic questions to ask to create a paper trail showing good faith attempts to obtain truthful and legal answers. You could also send the "what is Income" case law letter later, per above.
A Second series of Questions to send to the IRS Commissioner on how to determine your tax liability. Good for more proof of your good faith efforts to understand the law.
Here is the Treasury Department/IRS Response to Questions on income I personally sent the IRS. (You will notice that they evade completely the questions asked, and even state in their response that the laws "may be challenged through the judicial system" and that they don't have to respond to these types of questions under the FOIA (or any other request I would presume), so this means the average citizen who has questions won't be getting any answers from the IRS. I also sent this request to my two Senators and Congressman as well... and they SHOULD be able and willing to obtain the answers, but they never touched it.
Treasury Secretary Geithner letter and NOTICE of Fraud
Email for more information.